|
|
Top of the page
Delocalization of excitons in dimers
1
There exists a large variety of dimeric molecular systems from interacting
pair of guest molecules in a molecular mixed crystal to dimeric pigment
complexes in biological systems e.g. the so called B820 antenna complex from
purple bacteria or the special pair in the photosynthetic reaction center.
Excited states and their dynamics in molecular dimers has been studied
experimentally and theoretically by numerous authors. In the present work we
calculate the potential surfaces more generally including also the heterodimer,
where the transition energies of the two molecular sites are different.
Schematic picture of the excitonic coupled dimer
Using the model of two excitonically coupled electronic two-level systems with one-dimensional potential surfaces of the monomers given as displaced harmonic oscilators (see above) one obtains two excitonic states with adiabatic potential surfaces given by
The resulting potential surfaces depend on two parameters: v which represents the strength of the excitonic coupling and Δ which represents the difference in the transition energies of the monomers, both in units of the Stokes shift of the monomers. For several combinations of these parameters the potential surfaces of the lower (U-) and the upper (U+) one exciton state has been calculated (see below).
![]() |
![]() |
Point to parameter combinations v and Δ (assigned by · ) for a look on the lower exciton's potential surface U-.
The fluctuating forces fi(t), and the damping rate g are connected by the dissipation fluctuation theorem as
We have performed Monte-Carlo simulations of the nuclear motion to determine the time evolution of the statistical distribution of nuclear coordinates (see below).
Exciton dynamics for the lower exciton in the case v = 0.5 and Δ = 0.1.
The excitonic wave functions ψ+ and ψ-, respectively, given by the eigenvectors of the Hamiltonian containing exciton's potential energy U±, are delocalized over the dimer, i.e. they represents superpositions of the single-site excitations e1g2 and g1e2
. We quantify this by the delocalization length L± using the participation ratioNote that for the current potential energy U± defining the wave functions ψ±, the delocalization length L± depends on the nuclear coordinates as well as on the parameters v and Δ (see below).
,
![]() |
![]() |
(left) to see the dependences on the nuclear coordinates for L- (lower) and L+ (upper), respectively. (corresponding potential surfaces U- and U+ shown as overlaying white lines).Point to the assigned parameter combinations
Averaged over a statistical distribution of nuclear coordinates one obtains effective delocalization lengths Leff± , which are shown below for the following cases:
a b c d e h v 1 1.5 1 0.5 0.5 0.5 D 0 0 1 0 1 0.25

for lower exciton and Leff + (right) for upper excitonTime evolution of Leff- (left)
This results in a surface hopping from U+ to U-, which affects the nuclear motion and consequently the time evolution of the delocalization length (see below).
*The back transfer from the lower to the upper exciton will be ignored for thermodynamic reasons.
Time evolution of Leff± including surface hopping from upper to lower exciton